Paper: 320590
Title: Functional Learning & Introduction to the Electronic Brain on El-Dorra neural network tehnology

-------------------- review 1 --------------------
---------------------------- REVIEW 1 --------------------------
PAPER: 3
TITLE: Functional Learning & Introduction to the Electronic Brain on El-Dorra neural network tehnology
 
OVERALL RATING: 1 (weak accept) 
REVIEWER'S CONFIDENCE: 2 (medium) 
Relevance to this conference: 3 (fair)
Originality/Uniqueness: 3 (fair)
English readability: 2 (poor)
Paper organization/presentation: 2 (poor)
Has good survey been done?: 2 (poor)


The paper is rather a tutorial than research paper (it refers to XOR problem and there are no author's experiments in it). However, the idea of separete learning is interesting (since it is linked to the human brain) and should be popularized. So I would advice to publish the paper but after strong correction of the paper organisation.

Detailed remarks:
1. There are no references to other researches of separate learning
2. I would advise to change the style and language of presentation to more scientific one.
3. The paper layout should be rearanged - there are very weak connections between succeeding parts of the paper and therefore the paper is very difficult to read.
4. I would introduce to Introduction the description of the whole paper layout - it would make the paper more readible. 



-------------------- review 2 --------------------
---------------------------- REVIEW 2 --------------------------
PAPER: 3
TITLE: Functional Learning & Introduction to the Electronic Brain on El-Dorra neural network tehnology
 
OVERALL RATING: -3 (strong reject) 
REVIEWER'S CONFIDENCE: 2 (medium) 
Relevance to this conference: 4 (good)
Originality/Uniqueness: 3 (fair)
English readability: 2 (poor)
Paper organization/presentation: 2 (poor)
Has good survey been done?: 2 (poor)


It sounds unique when reviewer reads the description by the author that "we can change the activate functions and we fix the weights," but the author actually fails to appeal how it works better than the standard approach.

However, it's not the reason for the bad score. What is very bad is, the author seems to present exactly the same topic, method, and conclusion repeatedly in the different conferences without mentioning in this submission paper. For example, in the 4th International Conference on Neural, Parallel & Scientific Computations.

If the author survives the review procedure, he definitely should show, in his camera-ready version, how different this paper is from his previous reports, if any. 



-------------------- review 3 --------------------
---------------------------- REVIEW 3 --------------------------
PAPER: 3
TITLE: Functional Learning & Introduction to the Electronic Brain on El-Dorra neural network tehnology
 
OVERALL RATING: 1 (weak accept) 
REVIEWER'S CONFIDENCE: 2 (medium) 
Relevance to this conference: 5 (excellent)
Originality/Uniqueness: 4 (good)
English readability: 3 (fair)
Paper organization/presentation: 3 (fair)
Has good survey been done?: 4 (good)


The paper describes a different learning method & an electronic brain model. 
More specifically, authors introduce Electronic Brain on El-dorra neural network technology.
 
The paper is presenting a really novel and interesting technology. Technically and scientifically is a very good work.

However, I believe there is still place for more extended evaluation and  conclusions. 
Furthermore, the paper doesn�t follow the instructions for authors and English readability is rather fair. 

  
Concluding, I suggest to be accepted (with minor changes). 



-------------------- review 4 --------------------
---------------------------- REVIEW 4 --------------------------
PAPER: 3
TITLE: Functional Learning & Introduction to the Electronic Brain on El-Dorra neural network tehnology
 
OVERALL RATING: 1 (weak accept) 
REVIEWER'S CONFIDENCE: 2 (medium) 
Relevance to this conference: 4 (good)
Originality/Uniqueness: 4 (good)
English readability: 3 (fair)
Paper organization/presentation: 2 (poor)
Has good survey been done?: 3 (fair)


Authors present a new learning method. The paper describes Electronic Brain on El-dorra neural network technology.
 
The paper is a very good technical document.The proposed technology is presented in a very sophisticated way. 

However,  literature survey is rather limited. Also I would like to see more discussion concerning comparison with similar techniques.
I believe that in some cases it lacks in depth discussion. 
English readability is fair.
Furthermore, authors should follow the conference template.
  
I suggest to accept the paper (authors could follow previous comments).