Subject: Re: Fw: New document for review.
From: Jerzy Pejaś <[email-masked]>
To: Akira IMADA <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 10:00:03 +0200

Dear Professor,

Please find attached two papers you was requested to make the review. 
The reviews please send on my e-mail address. Thank you very much for 
support our Conference. I'm sorry for all inconveniences.

Best regards,
Jerzy Pejas

> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* AKIRA Imada <mailto:[email-masked]>
> *To:* [email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 14, 2008 2:59 PM
> *Subject:* Re: New document for review.
>
> Dear Someone in charge,
>  
> I succeeded in logging in and tried the below,
>  
> 3. Change your status form "participant" to "reviewer" and confirm 
> this opration click in "change" button".
> But I haven't found the "change" button anywhere in the page.
>  
> What should I do to take the assigned two papers to be reviewd.
>  
> Sorry for my innorance, if any.
>  
> Akira,
>  
>  
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     *From:* ACS <mailto:[email-masked]>
>     *To:* [email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>
>     *Sent:* Monday, May 12, 2008 6:01 PM
>     *Subject:* New document for review.
>
>     International Multi-Conference on Advanced Computer Systems,
>     Web address: http://acs.wi.ps.pl
>     15.10.2008 - 17.10.2008
>     Międzyzdroje, Poland
>
>     Dear, Professor
>     Akira Imada
>
>     We are sending this mail to you because in the past you were asked
>     by us if you are interested to support the ACS 2008 conference and
>     you agreed to do so.
>
>     Now, we would like to inform you that we sending you the Paper No 22:
>
>     Jeep problem and its 2D extension - the solution with an
>     application of the reinforcement learning
>
>     by
>
>     PhD eng Pluciński Marcin
>
>
>     and asking for your review.
>
>     We kindly ask you to return the review before June 30, 2008.
>
>     -----------------------------------------------------
>
>     Please recall, that having received a notice of paper for review,
>     you can fill attached review form (see below) for each reviewed
>     paper or can do the same on our Web site in the following steps:
>
>     1. Enter the ACS website http://acs.wi.ps.pl/.
>     2. Enter your identifier number and password:
>
>     Identifier: akira.imada
>     Password: papageno
>
>     3. Change your status form "participant" to "reviewer" and confirm
>     this opration click in "change" button".
>     3. Now click on "reviews" item from menu and choose any paper from
>     the list you have been sent to.
>     4. After you have chosen the a paper (please click on "edit" link
>     on the left side
>     of the paper title), the form for paper evalution and the link to
>     paper contents will appear.
>     5. Fill in the form of a paper evaluation and by pressing radio
>     button "finished"
>     indicate that the review is completed otherwise the paper won't be
>     considered
>     to be reviewed.
>     Don't flag the finish radio button in case you haven't finished a
>     paper
>     review, yet; with this your work will be saved and later you can
>     finish your
>     review.
>     6. In the case when your opinion about the reviewed paper is
>     positive and the
>     paper is appropiate for the publishing in the Conference book,
>     issued by Springer, then please indicate it additionaly (in the
>     Comments field).
>
>     If you have any question, please do not hesitate to contact us by
>     e-mail:
>     [email-masked]
>
>     -----------------------------------------------------
>     REVIEW FORM
>     ===========
>
>
>     Paper number:
>
>     Paper's title:
>
>     Authors:
>
>     Reviewer (Name, e-mail):
>
>     1) How familiar are you with the subject matter of the paper? [0-5]:
>     (0: Not at all ... 5: Very familiar)
>
>
>     2) Relevance to the conference [1-5]:
>     (1: not relevant to the conference to 5 :Very relevant)
>
>
>     3) Contribution and originality [1-5]:
>     (Do the presented results constitute a significant advance
>     (e.g., technical depth, novelty, creative solution, etc.)?)
>     (1: Not significant to 5: Very significant)
>
>
>     4) Paper readabilty, presentation and organization [1-5]:
>     (1: Poor to 5: Excellent)
>
>
>
>     5) Overall rating:
>     (1 : reject, 5 : Accept)
>
>
>     6) Comments to the Author(s):
>
>
>
>
>     7) Confidential Comments to the Editors:
>
>
>
>
>     -----------------------------------------------------
>
>     Best regards,
>     Jerzy Pejaś, PhD eng.
>     ACS 2008 Organising Committee, Chair
>
>     SECRETARIAT ADDRESS FOR CONTACTS
>
>     ACS 2008 Organising Committee
>
>     Sylwia Hardej, MSc
>     Faculty of Computer Science & Information Systems
>     Szczecin University of Technology
>     Zolnierska 49
>     71-210 Szczecin, Poland
>     tel. (+4891) 449 56 62
>     fax (+4891) 449 55 40
>     e-mail: [email-masked]
>     http://acs.wi.ps.pl
>
>