==================================================================================================
ABSTRACT'S REVIEW SHEET:

Review notes (public):  
Comments (public):  
  
Recommended presentation in case of positive evaluation (confidential):  
Oral PresentationPoster Presentation  
 
Suitability of the paper to be extended to a journal paper (confidential):  
absolutely not suitable (1) - certainly suitable (10)  12345678910 
 
Suggestion about acceptance (confidential):  
should be accepted  
should be rejected  


<1>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although the author wrote "In systems fully deserving the name "Intelligent Decision Support System" ..., the author failed to explain how intelligent the system is. The system does not seemed to be unique, useful, ... as far as the reviewer recognize from the paper. Hate say this but this is not only because of author's poor English but also because of lack of knowledge of how a scientific article should be. 

Suitability of the paper to be extended to a journal paper (confidential): 1
reject

<2>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quite an interesting paper, but the author fails to claim how the results are unique, healthy qnd/or useful. For example, has the data from USC never analyzed by such a machine learning technique before? If so, why it was not claimed in the paper? If not the case, how your analysis differs from them should be described. Although the author wrote "... because of the publication limits,..." still many space remain. The methods and results exploited should be explained more in detail. Camera-ready version should be much more improved.

Suitability of the paper to be extended to a journal paper (confidential): 3
accept


<3>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Topic is interesting and well described, but still lack of enough explanations. For example, what does PAI/IB stand for? Or, what are LCD, KNX/EIB, AIM GG etc? Should all readers know such terms without explanations? The paper is quite easy to read but still many incorrect usages in English are included, such as "netbook," "such a type of a solution," "consist of," "form Monday till," etc. etc. The author should improve a lot for the camera-ready version.

Suitability of the paper to be extended to a journal paper (confidential): 5
accept