1,2,3,poster,1,1,3 A stereo photogrammetry is proposed to collect distance information about surface as a method to acquire 3D model of bryophyte layer, and authors compared other similar methods already reported. none (1) Abstract is too long. It should be made up of only one paragraph. (2) Run a spell-checker. (3) Authors need to make an effort to make readers understand what authors write. (4) Reference should be according to the order of appearance. Even POSTER would not be acceptable. Review Paper ID - 39 A New Method for Bryophyte Canopy Analysis Based on 3D Surface Reconstruction spell check need an efort to make reader understand why list isn't according to the order of appearance in the text? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A stereo photogrammetry is proposed to collect distance information about surfaces as a method to acquire 3D model of bryophyte layer, and author compared other similar methods already reported. , a non-contact passive method of and thus Lr and compared it with methods already performed by other authors - Overall rating Reject - requested Reject - suggested Bellow average quality Average quality Above average quality Accept - suggested Accept - requested -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer's expertise in paper's field Low Medium High -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Topics Signal Analysis Biometrics and Image Analysis Computer Graphics and Vision Object Classification and Recognition Artificial Intelligence Computer Simulation Computer Security and Safety Medical, Multimedia, Industrial and other Applications Data compression Business Strategy Product Development Production / Operation Management Productivity and Quality Supply Chain Management Organization Culture Management Accounting Disaster Management -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Type Oral presentationPoster -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paper summary -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Positive aspects -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Negative aspects -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paper length Longer than required Adequate length Paper is too short -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Required changes in paper Too many Many Few No changes required -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Publication in Journal Definitely yes Yes No Not at all -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment to chair --------------------------------------------------------------------------------