review memo
<20>
Uncertainty of authors' English descriptions is ubiquitous. For example, what actually does it mean by "AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION OF IMAGES" in the title? Or, "The following opportunities of making the correct decision during processing of the neural network on the image according to two selected trajectories have been analyzed," which appears at the very beginning of the paper. Reviewers cannot understand many such descriptions in English.

Citation like [1} in the text is not allowed. what is [1] actually? Thus authors cite 9 papers in the text but in the list of Reference we see only 7 papers. So reviewer doubt this paper is a copy from a paper the author present in another conference.

Despite the author wrote "neural network" but the reviewer do not know even its structure.

The authors fail to show how this is unique. as well as how the results are important, which the reviewers cannot find in the paper.

It's a minor thing, but the titles of sections should be more simple ones. Also the reviewer think a blank line should be inserted between two paragraphs, in this style.