--------------------------------------------------------------
--- For your convenience, this form can be processed by EasyChair
--- automatically. You can fill out this form offline and then
--- upload it to EasyChair. Several review forms can be uploaded
--- simultaneously. You can modify your reviews as many times as
--- you want.
--- When filling out the review form please mind
--- the following rules:
--- (1) Lines beginning with --- are comments. EasyChair will
---     ignore them. Do not start lines in your review with ---
---     as they will be ignored. You can add comments to the
---     review form or remove them
--- (2) Lines beginning with *** are used by EasyChair. Do not
---     remove or modify these lines or the review will become
---     unusable and will be rejected by EasyChair
--------------------------------------------------------------
*** REVIEW FORM ID: 364422::198847
*** SUBMISSION NUMBER: 21
*** TITLE: Choice of Free Arguments in Decomposition of Boolean Functions using the Ternary Matrix Cover Approach
*** AUTHORS: (anonymous)
*** PC MEMBER: Daichi Sirano
--------------------------------------------------------------
*** REVIEW:
---  Please provide a detailed review, including justification for
---  your scores. This review will be sent to the authors unless
---  the PC chairs decide not to do so. This field is required.
The logic described seems to be sound. Examples are appropriate. English is fairly good. So, the reviewer thinks its a good paper, although nothing to do with neural network or artificial intelligence, at least explicitly.

Still, however, careful proofread will be necessary. For example, what is "???" followed "columns are marked with the variables ...," or, "Few papers deal with ... " might be "Only a few papers deal with ..." because the author lists some of them. So "few" should be "a few." Also "which is absorbs no row of U" should be "which absorbs no row of U."

Delete "Note that the caption should be above the table."  Quatation marks in the Reference are something strange. 





--------------------------------------------------------------
*** REMARKS FOR THE PROGRAMME COMMITTEE:
---  If you wish to add any remarks for PC members, please write
---  them below. These remarks will only be used during the PC
---  meeting. They will not be sent to the authors. This field is
---  optional.

--------------------------------------------------------------
--- If the review was written by (or with the help from) a
--- subreviewer different from the PC member in charge, add
--- information about the subreviewer in the form below. Do not
--- modify the lines beginning with ***
*** REVIEWER'S FIRST NAME: (write in the next line)

*** REVIEWER'S LAST NAME: (write in the next line)

*** REVIEWER'S EMAIL ADDRESS: (write in the next line)

--------------------------------------------------------------
--- In the evaluations below, uncomment the line with your
--- evaluation or confidence. You can also remove the
--- irrelevant lines
*** OVERALL EVALUATION:

---  3 (strong accept)
2 (accept)
---  1 (weak accept)
---  0 (borderline paper)
---  -1 (weak reject)
---  -2 (reject)
---  -3 (strong reject)

*** REVIEWER'S CONFIDENCE:

---  4 (expert)
---  3 (high)
2 (medium)
---  1 (low)
---  0 (null)

*** RELEVANCE TO THIS CONFERENCE: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest)

---  5 (excellent)
---  4 (good)
---  3 (fair)
---  2 (poor)
1 (very poor)

*** ORIGINALITY/UNIQUENESS: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest)

---  5 (excellent)
4 (good)
---  3 (fair)
---  2 (poor)
---  1 (very poor)

*** ENGLISH READABILITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest)

---  5 (excellent)
4 (good)
---  3 (fair)
---  2 (poor)
---  1 (very poor)

*** PAPER ORGANIZATION/PRESENTATION: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest)

---  5 (excellent)
4 (good)
---  3 (fair)
---  2 (poor)
---  1 (very poor)

*** HAS GOOD SURVEY BEEN DONE?: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest)

---  5 (excellent)
---  4 (good)
3 (fair)
---  2 (poor)
---  1 (very poor)

*** END
--------------------------------------------------------------