--------------------------------------------------------------
--- For your convenience, this form can be processed by EasyChair
--- automatically. You can fill out this form offline and then
--- upload it to EasyChair. Several review forms can be uploaded
--- simultaneously. You can modify your reviews as many times as
--- you want.
--- When filling out the review form please mind
--- the following rules:
--- (1) Lines beginning with --- are comments. EasyChair will
---     ignore them. Do not start lines in your review with ---
---     as they will be ignored. You can add comments to the
---     review form or remove them
--- (2) Lines beginning with *** are used by EasyChair. Do not
---     remove or modify these lines or the review will become
---     unusable and will be rejected by EasyChair
--------------------------------------------------------------
*** REVIEW FORM ID: 369961::198847
*** SUBMISSION NUMBER: 25
*** TITLE: Application of artificial neural networks for forecasting of characteristics of transport streams and adaptive regulation at crossroads
*** AUTHORS: (anonymous)
*** PC MEMBER: Daichi Sirano
--------------------------------------------------------------
*** REVIEW:
---  Please provide a detailed review, including justification for
---  your scores. This review will be sent to the authors unless
---  the PC chairs decide not to do so. This field is required.
The expression in English in this paper is very hard to understand. For example, what on earth is meant by "Application of neural networks for forecasting of characteristics of a stream will allow using more difficult and effective control algorithms."?

Also the author should proof-read carefully. The reviewer ubiquitously found typo's and or mistakes in grammar like "such at" for "such as" or "a continuation of researches" for "a continuation of a research," etc. Also variables like m should be italicized

Do not cite references in abstract. Abstract should be independent on the text.

But what is [8], for example? we cannot know it from the Reference list.

This topic is not a new one at all. Nevertheless, survey is really poor. The author should show what results have been made so far, and what is the new proposition and/or results by the authors. Authors fail to show all of this. As such, the reviewer fails to find any uniqueness of this study.

--------------------------------------------------------------
*** REMARKS FOR THE PROGRAMME COMMITTEE:
---  If you wish to add any remarks for PC members, please write
---  them below. These remarks will only be used during the PC
---  meeting. They will not be sent to the authors. This field is
---  optional.

--------------------------------------------------------------
--- If the review was written by (or with the help from) a
--- subreviewer different from the PC member in charge, add
--- information about the subreviewer in the form below. Do not
--- modify the lines beginning with ***
*** REVIEWER'S FIRST NAME: (write in the next line)

*** REVIEWER'S LAST NAME: (write in the next line)

*** REVIEWER'S EMAIL ADDRESS: (write in the next line)

--------------------------------------------------------------
--- In the evaluations below, uncomment the line with your
--- evaluation or confidence. You can also remove the
--- irrelevant lines
*** OVERALL EVALUATION:

---  3 (strong accept)
---  2 (accept)
---  1 (weak accept)
---  0 (borderline paper)
---  -1 (weak reject)
-2 (reject)
---  -3 (strong reject)

*** REVIEWER'S CONFIDENCE:

---  4 (expert)
---  3 (high)
2 (medium)
---  1 (low)
---  0 (null)

*** RELEVANCE TO THIS CONFERENCE: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest)

---  5 (excellent)
4 (good)
---  3 (fair)
---  2 (poor)
---  1 (very poor)

*** ORIGINALITY/UNIQUENESS: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest)

---  5 (excellent)
---  4 (good)
---  3 (fair)
---  2 (poor)
1 (very poor)

*** ENGLISH READABILITY: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest)

---  5 (excellent)
---  4 (good)
---  3 (fair)
---  2 (poor)
1 (very poor)

*** PAPER ORGANIZATION/PRESENTATION: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest)

---  5 (excellent)
---  4 (good)
---  3 (fair)
---  2 (poor)
1 (very poor)

*** HAS GOOD SURVEY BEEN DONE?: from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest)

---  5 (excellent)
---  4 (good)
---  3 (fair)
---  2 (poor)
1 (very poor)

*** END
--------------------------------------------------------------