Basically this is a good paper and well organized. but there are still some rooms to be refined.

[I] As for reference:

(1) Already published paper "Reduction of Rules of a Fuzzy Model with a Chain Model" seems to be closely relevant. So it should definitely be referred to, and should be clearly shown how this submitted paper related to the paper.

(2) The paper [11] should be given in a way like, "... according to Niderinski [11] ..."

(3) In this style, we usually list references according to the order of appearance in the text.


[II] As for explanations:

(1) Expressions like chain data distribution; chain profile; chain dependence; chain nature might be better to be explained. The author explains about "interpolation and extrapolation" later in the section, but the reviewer thinks that the terms such as chain data distribution, chain profile, chain dependence and chain nature are less familiar than interpolation and extrapolation for ordinary readers. Actually the expression "chain data distribution" appeared firstly in the end of introduction without explanation of what is this, then again in the subsection 2.1 it is assumed to be known by everyone.

(2) Success of this method relies on data structure. This data of unemployment rate in Poland is an example that wields a good results. It might be better to describe an example of the data that cannot be successfully applied and the one that will show an intermediate results.

[III] As for Caption of Figures:

(1) Caption of Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 should be corrected, that is, (b) should be (d).

(2) Caption of Fig. 3 might be like, "Hypercube (a) and convex hull (b) covered an identical data set."

[IV] Other miner suggestions:

(1) Frequently appeared "t parameter" in the text should be "parameter t." The same holds "value t" not "t value." This is like we don't say "t time" but usually "time t."

(2) The expression "dependencies between a, b and c" might be better "... among a, b and c," or preferably to be "dependence of a and b on c."

(3) The number of data N and n should be either N or n (p. 3). Maybe p_{n} might be p_{N}

(4) "a lot methods" should be  "a lot of methods."  

(5) "- these which supports contain" might be "so that they contain..." (p. 6)



The reviewer expects this paper will appear in the proceedings with much elaborations.










==================================================================================================
[title]
quality of rule bases
t parameter => parameter t

caption Fig 1 and 2

Niederlinski previously refered?
caption of fig 3 ->? over an identical data set

t value =>  balue t

2nd
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------"Reduction of Rules of a Fuzzy Model with a Chain Model  -> already proposed -> indicate the difference

order of reference list?
in this style usually the order of appearance in the text


in case not almighty, which data can be better to be applied, and which will not be


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
chain data distribution appeared firstly in the end of introduction without expalanation of what is this

then subsection 2.1 again it is assumed to be known by every one

chain data distribution; chain profile; chain dependence; chain nature

depencencies between A , b and c -> among

such as explanation of interporation and extraporation lator

[11] should be given after niderinski is first appeared, i.e., according to Niderinski[11]

pn => PN

a lot => a lot of